computer poker game
Tuesday, May 17, 2005
Online Games.
Online Poker Holds A Unique Spot In The World Of Online GamesOnline Poker holds a unique spot in the world of online casino games: it could be your best shot to earn money in the online casino or it could be an exercise in humiliation. What is the best poker strategy? Online poker is complex. It's complex, not because of its rules, but because of its variables: human behavior and ever-changing odds. There's no doubt that luck plays a major role in short term poker success but over the long run, poker is certainly a game of skill. Like any classic game of skill, poker demands study and practice from those who want to achieve mastery. Here are some the basic building blocks of a good poker strategy: * To have a good poker strategy, a poker player should have a conscious or unconscious understanding of odds and expectation. Ofcourse, these numbers are not often as clear-cut as in other casino games. It's likely that you would have to work with the numbers mechanically before they become second nature to you * Pot odds are really just another way of looking at expectation. It compares the amount of money in the pot to the amount of money you would have put in to continue playing. It helps answer the eternal question in poker strategy: "Is it worth it to continue in this hand?" To answer that, you always have to have a sense of card odds. Lets say the pot contains $100 and you need to put in $10 to continue playing. The pot odds are 10 - 1. If you have a better chance of winning than that, it's worth calling. When the card odds are better than the pot odds, it makes good poker strategy sense to get out. Have a 25-1 chance of getting that inside straight? Time to fold. * A bad poker strategy is to play too many hands. Most players play way too many hands. You will win more by folding more often. This sort of discipline is difficult for the recreational player. If you read the experts' books, you'll see how they preach patience and discipline, and you'll be shocked by how many hands they say to throw away. Particularly in casinos, you have to play tight - there are more players at the tables and thus less of a chance that you'll have the best hand. * Another good poker strategy is to note that the bluff is not as key an element of the game as you may think. Clever deception has its manifold pleasures, but it shouldn't be done indiscriminately. As part of your poker strategy, you can use the concept of pot odds to guide your bluffing. An occasional, not-too-costly "discovered bluff" (one that doesnt work) may also help you win bigger pots in later hands. Players may think you are a 'bluffer' and stay in when you actually do have a good hand. * For the player seeking a profit, a good poker game is not one where titans of equal strength square off against each other. The law of the jungle rules the poker table. The secret of winning money consistently is to find games with players who play worse than you do. Successful players need weak players who obviously allow their money to be siphoned away by strong players. Guilt does not pay in poker, guile does, so make it a part of your strategy. These are but a few poker strategy tips. In the long run, you have control of your own poker fate. Stay calm, dont play wildly and desperately and you should be alright.
posted by computer poker game at 12:21 AM 
Friday, May 13, 2005
Computer Poker Games.
For years, games researchers have used chess, checkers and other boardgames as a testbed for machine intelligence research. The success of world-championship-caliber programs for these games has resulted in a number ofinteresting games being overlooked. Specifically, we show that poker canserve as a better testbed for machine intelligence research related to decisionmaking problems. Poker is a game of imperfect knowledge, where multiplecompeting agents must deal with risk management, agent modeling,unreliable information and deception, much like decision-makingapplications in the real world. The heuristic search and evaluation methodssuccessfully employed in chess are not helpful here. This paper outlines thedifficulty of playing strong poker, and describes our first steps towardsbuilding a world-class poker-playing program.Keywords: poker, imperfect information, opponent modeling, computer games1. IntroductionWhy study computer games? By writing programs that play games, some insightscan be gained about machine intelligence. These lessons can then be used to develop usefulnon-game programs. Researchers have spent a lot of time and effort on board games suchas chess and checkers. These games all share the property that high performance can beachieved by brute-force search. This emphasis on search was taken to the extreme by theDeep Blue chess machine, which analyzed 200 million positions per second in its May1997 match against World Chess Champion Garry Kasparov. This achievement only confirmed the effectiveness of brute-force search for some application domains.
posted by computer poker game at 10:22 PM 
Wednesday, May 11, 2005
Poker Games.
Miss Mittie kept track of bills, poker games. As a youngster I spent my summers working as a page in the state legislature. It was an invaluable learning experience and a glimpse into the world of politics, but it was a lot simpler time. When I observe today's legislature the most striking difference is computerization. In the 1960s the telephone was our most advanced technology. However, I fondly remember a little lady named Miss Mittie who was far superior to any computer. The Legislature met in the Capitol. The second floor housed both chambers of the legislature. The circular rotunda between the two bodies was total chaos while the legislature was in session. Lobbyists, legislators, and everybody who thought they had some interest in legislation were shoulder to shoulder, you could hardly move. Grand Central Station in New York could not have been busier or more hectic. You could not see her, but sitting quietly on a corner bench next to the door was Miss Mittie, wearing a floor length black dress and black hat. She sat in her same place knitting everyday, never looking up. Some people said she had been coming to her spot in the Capitol everyday for more than 25 years. It was not certain who paid her, or if she was even paid, but she was more knowledgeable than anyone about what was going on at the Capitol. For you see, Miss Mittie knew where everybody was at any time day or night. She was the first one there in the morning and the last to leave at night. She never left her perch. It did not matter what legislator was needed, she could tell you exactly where they were. As a permanent page you can bet I got to know Miss Mittie. If a veteran lobbyist who Miss Mittie trusted and liked asked her about a House bill, she used to tell him without looking up from her knitting, "It's in Ways and Means, but it ain't going nowhere. Rankin Fite don't like it. It's dead." Then when asked about a Senate bill she might say, "It's pending in the Rules Committee and Sen. Walter Givhan can't get it out because the governor ain't for it." As I got older Lt. Gov. Albert Brewer made me head of the Senate pages. When other pages would come in for their two-week appointments I would introduce them to Miss Mittie. They were amazed at her knowledge of each legislator's whereabouts. If we needed a senator for a vote and nobody knew where he was I would maneuver through the maize of people in the rotunda and ask Miss Mittie. Without looking up she would say, "He's down at the Elite restaurant eating supper." I would ask about a House member and without missing a minute knitting she would whisper, "He's down at his room at the old Exchange Hotel taking a nap." or "He's down in the governor's office. Wallace is trying to change his vote." She knew if there was a poker game going on, who was in it, and where it was being held. I imagine she even knew how much money each legislator had lost. Although Miss Mittie knew everything that went on under the Capitol dome, she would not tell you anything if she did not know you real well. She knew that as head of the pages I needed to know where somebody was for a reason. I did not care why they were there or what they were doing, but I had to report back to the lt. governor or speaker when to expect the legislator back because their vote might be important. Miss Mittie was an institution. Casual observers would look at her dressed in her 1940s garb looking like a matronly grandmother going to a funeral sitting in the corner of the crowded Capitol rotunda knitting and think to themselves, "What is that odd lady doing here?" However, you can rest assured veterans of Goat Hill knew who Miss Mittie was and if they were smart they got to know her well. She put real meaning to the Teddy Roosevelt adage. Miss Mittie spoke so softly you could barely hear her, but she carried a big stick. I never knew Miss Mittie's last name. I do not know when she died. Like I said earlier, I do not know if the state paid her or if she just volunteered to be the oracle of the Capitol, but I guarantee you no computer today could do what Miss Mittie did at the Capitol for several decades.
posted by computer poker game at 10:28 PM 
Thursday, May 05, 2005
Internet Poker Games.
I haven’t much time to play poker these days, as I am so busy with other projects. Mind you, they all are poker-related, but they keep me very busy. I am not complaining … life is good! The little amount of time I do have for poker is generally spent on the Internet. I like to play low-limit hold’em, stud eight-or-better, and Omaha eight-or-better. I really enjoy the $3-$6 games. I also like the $100 buy-in no-limit hold’em games. Hmm, I pretty much like to play all games! When I am not doing a zillion other things at the same time, I play a little higher, up to $20-$40 Omaha eight-or-better, but usually my top limit online is $15-$30 hold’em or $10-$20 Omaha eight-or-better. There are several things I have found to be totally consistent in all of these games, as widely divergent as they are. One is the poor level of play and how consistently beatable they are. The players like to gamble, for sure. I don’t know whether they really play that badly or if it is because they are anonymous, but they are not afraid to take the worst of it time after time for all of their chips. Another thing I have found to be consistent is the bad behavior! Yes, that’s right, bad behavior in the Internet poker games. The chat is just unreal sometimes.
posted by computer poker game at 11:40 PM 
Wednesday, May 04, 2005
Computer poker games at alamopoker.com
Poker Academy, a leading software developer of computer poker,has donated $13,000 in software to Lehigh University for students in computer science and engineering to use in artificial intelligence (AI) research projects. Hector Munoz-Avila, assistant professor of computer science and engineering, said the donated software will be used in “Artificial Intelligence: Game Programming,” a course offered last fall for the first time that will be taught again next fall. The goal of the students using the donated software in the new class, which Munoz-Avila teaches, will be to make better, more challenging computer games that adapt to a player’s behavior, style and level of skill. “Only a few games currently employ adaptive artificial intelligence, which is also called machine learning,” said Munoz-Avila, who has a grant from the Naval Research Laboratory to study game programming. “Most are ‘hard-coded’ to operate at a fixed level or levels.
posted by computer poker game at 1:13 AM 
Tuesday, May 03, 2005
fun computer poker games
House Speaker Jim Black is a champion of the video poker industry and thwarted legislation banning video poker from being debated on the House floor. Retailers and industry lobbyists in 2002 donated $121,000 to Black, according to a 2004 report by Democracy North Carolina, a campaign finance watchdog.
posted by computer poker game at 11:09 PM 
Computer poker games at Alamo.
There is no one "expert play" method that covers all video poker games. Each change in the pay table changes the odds of the game. Expert play is different for Jacks or Better than for Double Bonus Poker or Deuces Wild. Even within the same game, expert strategy changes with pay tables --- 9-7 Double Bonus Computer Poker games has some key strategy differences from 9-6 Double Bonus. I can't detail all the nuances of expert strategy in one column --- I spent 270 pages picking apart strategy differences in my Video Poker Answer Book. But what we can do is try a few sample hands to show how expert play works. Let's start with a hand that we play one way in Jacks or Better, but differently in Double Bonus Poker. Say we're dealt 5-5-6-7-8 of mixed suits. We have two reasonable draws --- either we hold the pair of 5s, or we hold 5-6-7-8 and hope for a straight. In either game, holding the four-card straight leaves 47 potential draws, with 39 losers and eight straights with any of the four 4s or four 9s. Holding the pair of 5s leaves 16,125 possible draws, with 11,559 losers, 2,592 that will leave us with two pair, 1,854 that give us three of a kind, 165 full houses and 45 four of a kind draws.
posted by computer poker game at 5:29 AM 
|